SectionProSectionPro

2026-03-03 · 15 min

Mechanical Properties

SectionPro Tutorial — Square section, hollow circular section & L-shaped wall

Introduction

The mechanical properties of a section — area, moments of inertia, centroid, torsion constant, shear areas — are the starting point of any structural analysis. This article shows how to obtain them with SectionPro, on three different geometries:

  1. Square section — the simplest case, all properties can be computed analytically.
  2. Hollow circular section — torsion and inertia remain analytical, but shear areas require a numerical computation.
  3. L-shaped wall — only the geometric properties are analytical. Torsion, shear, and warping are purely numerical. This section illustrates the case of an asymmetric geometry ().

Computed properties

SectionPro computes the following properties. The first three groups are calculated for the gross section, net section (deducting voids at reinforcement locations), and transformed section (accounting for reinforcement through the modular ratio ):

General results

— Area
— Centroid
— Perimeter
— Linear weight

Centroidal axes

— Moments of inertia
— Extreme fibers ()
— Extreme fibers ()

Principal axes

— Rotation angle
— Principal moments of inertia
— Extreme fibers

Torsion & shear (FEM)

— Torsion constant
— Shear areas
— Shear center
— Warping constant

The torsion and shear properties require solving a differential equation using the finite element method.

Square section

Input data

Concrete — Side length m, density t/m³. Reinforcement — HA25 at 200 mm spacing, cover 50 mm, 1 layer — modular ratio .

Input and results

Square section input.
Square section input.
Mechanical properties results page.
Mechanical properties results page.

Due to double symmetry, the centroid lies at the center of the square, the principal angle is zero, and both moments of inertia are equal.

General results

UnitGrossNetTransf.
4.00003.98234.0707
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m8.0000
T/m10.0000

Bending — Centroidal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴1.33331.32261.3761
m⁴1.33331.32261.3761
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000

Bending — Principal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴1.33331.32261.3761
m⁴1.33331.32261.3761
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
°0.000.000.00

Torsion and shear (FEM)

Due to double symmetry, the shear center coincides with the centroid ( m). Warping is nearly zero (). The ratio , typical of a solid section.

Torsional shear stress $\tau$ — maximum at the mid-sides.
Torsional shear stress — maximum at the mid-sides.
Shear stresses.
Shear stresses.
Unitm⁴mmm⁶
Value2.24923.33333.33331.00001.00000.0086

Hollow circular section

Input data

Concrete — Outer diameter m, wall thickness m, density t/m³. Reinforcement — 24 HA20, cover 50 mm, 1 layer — modular ratio .

Input and results

Hollow circular section input.
Hollow circular section input.
Mechanical properties results page.
Mechanical properties results page.

Due to circular symmetry, the moments of inertia are equal and the principal angle is indeterminate (displayed as 0°).

General results

UnitGrossNetTransf.
1.60221.58711.6625
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m6.2832
T/m4.0055

Bending — Centroidal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴0.59680.59130.6189
m⁴0.59680.59130.6189
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000

Bending — Principal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴0.59680.59130.6189
m⁴0.59680.59130.6189
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
m1.00001.00001.0000
°0.000.000.00

Torsion and shear (FEM)

Due to rotational symmetry, the shear center coincides with the centroid ( m) and warping is zero (). The ratio : the hollow section is less efficient in shear than a solid section.

Torsional shear stress $\tau$ — maximum on the outer contour.
Torsional shear stress — maximum on the outer contour.
Shear stresses.
Shear stresses.
Unitm⁴mmm⁶
Value1.19360.84220.84221.00001.00000.0000

L-shaped wall

Input data

Concrete — L-shape — width 2.0 m, height 2.0 m, thickness m, density t/m³. Reinforcement — HA20 at 200 mm spacing, cover 40 mm, 1 layer — modular ratio .

Input and results

L-shaped wall input.
L-shaped wall input.
Mechanical properties results page.
Mechanical properties results page.

Since both flanges have the same length, and the principal angle is exactly .

General results

UnitGrossNetTransf.
1.11001.09741.1603
m0.60950.60930.6100
m0.60950.60930.6100
m8.0000
T/m2.7750

Bending — Centroidal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴0.40300.39810.4225
m⁴0.40300.39810.4225
m1.39051.39071.3900
m0.60950.60930.6100
m1.39051.39071.3900
m0.60950.60930.6100

Bending — Principal axes

UnitGrossNetTransf.
m⁴0.63730.62970.6679
m⁴0.16870.16660.1771
m1.41421.41421.4142
m1.41421.41421.4142
m0.76440.76440.7644
m0.86190.86190.8619
°45.0045.0045.00

Torsion and shear (FEM)

The shear center ( m) is offset toward the re-entrant corner, far from the centroid ( m). Warping is significant ( m⁶). The torsion constant m⁴ is very small — typical of an open thin-walled section. The ratio .

Torsional shear stress $\tau$ — stress concentration at the re-entrant corner. Shear center offset.
Torsional shear stress — stress concentration at the re-entrant corner. Shear center offset.
Shear stresses.
Shear stresses.
Unitm⁴mmm⁶
Value0.03220.50370.50370.16370.16370.0091

Results validation

SectionPro results are validated in two ways: by comparison with analytical formulas (when they exist) and by cross-validation with reference software using an independent finite element solver.

Analytical formulas

Square section ( m)

The torsion constant is obtained from the Saint-Venant series:

Hollow circular section ( m, m)

Shear areas do not have a simple closed-form expression; the differential equation must be solved numerically.

L-shaped wall ( m, m)

By decomposition (flange + web ) and the Parallel Axis Theorem:

There is no exact analytical formula for torsion, shear, and warping. However, Vlasov beam theory (open thin-walled sections) provides an order of magnitude: m⁴ and the shear center lies approximately at the intersection of the flange mid-lines ( m). These estimates assume an infinitely small thickness compared to the flange length; here , and thickness effects shift the actual values from this simplified model.

Net and transformed sections

For a section reinforced with steel bars of area at coordinates , with modular ratio :

The centroid shifts slightly:

The moment of inertia is derived using the Parallel Axis Theorem, accounting for the centroid shift :

Validation — Bending properties

The analytical formulas above were applied to all three sections using the exact reinforcement coordinates exported by SectionPro. All results match.

SectionPropertyGrossΔNetΔTransf.Δ
Square (m²)4.00000.00 %3.98230.00 %4.07070.00 %
(m)1.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %
(m⁴)1.33330.00 %1.32260.00 %1.37610.00 %
Hollow circ. (m²)1.60220.00 %1.58710.00 %1.66250.00 %
(m)1.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %
(m⁴)0.59680.00 %0.59130.00 %0.61890.00 %
L-wall (m²)1.11000.00 %1.09740.00 %1.16030.00 %
(m)0.60950.00 %0.60930.00 %0.61000.00 %
(m⁴)0.40300.00 %0.39810.00 %0.42250.00 %

Validation — Torsion and shear (cross-validation)

Torsion and shear properties, computed by finite elements, are compared with reference software using an independent solver.

SectionPropertyAnalyticalSectionProΔRef.Δ
Square (m⁴)2.24892.24920.01 %2.25850.41 %
(m²)3.33333.33330.00 %3.33550.07 %
(m)1.00001.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %
Hollow circ. (m⁴)1.19361.19360.00 %1.19200.13 %
(m²)0.84220.8418
(m)1.00001.00000.00 %1.00000.00 %
L-wall (m⁴)0.03220.0328
(m²)0.50370.5054
(m²)0.50370.5024
(m)0.16370.1639
L-wall — Vlasov beam theory ( m⁴, m) provides a comparable order of magnitude, but remains an approximation as it considers segments with zero thickness (whereas ).

Conclusion

SectionValidationBending errorTorsion error (ref.)
SquareAnalytical0.00 %0.41 %
Hollow circ.Analytical + reference (, )0.00 %0.13 %
L-wallAnalytical + reference (, , , , )0.00 %1.86 %

Bending properties (area, centroid, moments of inertia) are reproduced with perfect accuracy across all three geometries, for gross, net, and transformed sections (0.00% deviation from analytical formulas).

Torsion and shear properties, computed by finite elements, depend on mesh refinement. Cross-validation with reference software shows excellent agreement between both solvers. SectionPro exhibits better convergence, as evidenced by its exact match with analytical torsion and shear solutions when they exist.